Glossary
Key terms and concepts in Alignment Theory, from A to Z. Each entry gives a working definition and links to the pages where the concept is used and developed.
Agency
AThe capacity of a system to initiate, sustain, and revise its own activity in relation to its goals and environment. Agency is not merely output but the active origination of behavior. In Alignment Theory, diminished agency is one early sign of substitutive dependence.
See: Agency, Executive Control, and Inner Regulation · Low Agency Increases Steerability
Alignment Theory
AA structural framework for understanding how adaptive systems remain robust or become fragile depending on how their load-bearing functions are carried. The core claim: capacity decays when function is preserved without participation.
See: Revised Framework Center · What the Framework Actually Claims · Where to Start
Borrowed Order
BApparent order that is being carried from outside the focal system rather than arising from strengthened participation in the function itself. Borrowed order can maintain surface stability while the system's own load-bearing capacity continues to erode.
Boundary Conditions
BThe conditions under which Alignment Theory reaches its limits, fails to apply, or requires significant qualification. The framework does not claim to explain all dysfunction, and its honest use requires knowing where it does and does not fit.
Capacity Decay
CThe gradual erosion of a system's ability to carry its own load-bearing functions, typically without visible decline in immediate outputs. Capacity decay is often invisible precisely because function is being preserved by external substitution.
See: Why Structural Dependence Hides Behind Functional Success · The Formation Mechanism
Coherence
CStructural integration across a system's functions such that behavior, identity, and load-bearing capacity are mutually reinforcing rather than maintained by external scaffolding. Distinguished from mere performance or surface consistency.
Constitutive Co-Regulation
CSupport that belongs to healthy functioning itself — not an add-on or a replacement, but a genuine part of how the system carries its functions. Constitutive co-regulation preserves and deepens participation rather than eroding it.
See: Participation, Co-Regulation, and Substitution · The Four Modes of Support
Counterfeit Order
CA condition in which the outward appearance of order and functioning is maintained by external control rather than by the system's own structural coherence. Counterfeit order is a form of borrowed order that specifically replaces the function it mimics.
Default Mode Network (DMN)
DA set of brain regions (medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, angular gyrus) that are most active during self-referential thought, narrative integration, and rest. In Alignment Theory, the DMN is understood as the neural substrate for self-modeling, moral imagination, and integrative formation.
See: How the Revised Model Maps to the DMN · The DMN and the Self-Model · Renewal of the Mind
Developmental Scaffolding
DTemporary support ordered toward stronger future participation. In developmental scaffolding, external carrying of a function is appropriate and beneficial because it is calibrated to fade as the developing system grows capable of bearing the load itself.
See: The Four Modes of Support · Parenting and Development · Education Stress Test
Distributed Competence
DSee Stable Distributed Competence.
Formation
FThe process by which a system develops genuine load-bearing capacity over time, as opposed to merely acquiring outputs or behavioral compliance. Formation changes what the system can carry; performance does not.
See: The Formation Mechanism · How Formation Fails · Why Performance Is Easier Than Transformation
Four Modes of Support
FThe four types of support relation in Alignment Theory: (1) constitutive co-regulation, (2) developmental scaffolding, (3) stable distributed competence, and (4) substitutive dependence. The first three preserve or build participatory capacity; the fourth erodes it.
See: Load-Bearing Function and the Four Modes · Four Structural States
Four Structural States
FA 2×2 framework crossing support presence (low/high) against participatory capacity (low/high), yielding four distinct structural conditions: unsupported formation, healthy participation, atrophied dependence, and developmental growth.
Inward Coherence
IThe condition in which a system's functioning flows from genuine structural integration rather than from compliance, performance, or borrowed support. Inward coherence is not isolation from relation but genuine participation in load-bearing function.
See: What Inward Coherence Is · On the Inner/Outer Distinction
Load-Bearing Function
LA function whose degradation changes resilience, viability, developmental integrity, or durable competence rather than merely reducing efficiency. The framework distinguishes load-bearing functions from peripheral functions because their erosion is qualitatively different — it changes what the system can do on its own terms.
See: Load-Bearing Function and the Four Modes · Biological Stress Test · Load-Bearing Human Capacities in the AI Age
Participatory Capacity
PThe system's active share in forming, carrying, and revising a load-bearing function — as opposed to merely receiving its outputs. Participatory capacity is the framework's central diagnostic variable. When it erodes, structural fragility grows even if outputs remain stable.
See: Participation, Co-Regulation, and Substitution · Revised Framework Center · The Four Modes of Support
Performance
PThe production of expected outputs without the formation of the underlying capacity that genuine participation would require. Performance is easier than transformation because it bypasses structural change. In Alignment Theory, distinguishing performance from formation is one of the primary diagnostic tasks.
See: Why Performance Is Easier Than Transformation · When Inner Life Becomes Performance
Perturbation Test
PThe diagnostic question: what becomes visible when stress, variation, delay, loss, or disruption hits the system? The perturbation test is the primary tool for distinguishing genuine structural capacity from borrowed or substituted function, because hidden dependence becomes visible when the substitute is removed or stressed.
See: Biological Stress Test · Shared Core Structure Across Domains
Reintegration
RThe process of restoring participatory capacity after substitutive dependence has taken hold. Reintegration is harder than initial formation and involves gradually re-exposing the system to the load-bearing function in ways that rebuild rather than re-substitute.
Scaffolding
SSee Developmental Scaffolding. When scaffolding hardens — i.e., when it stops being temporary and becomes a permanent external carrier of the function — it transitions into substitutive dependence.
See: Scaffolding and Counterfeit Order · When Scaffolding Hardens
Stable Distributed Competence
SDurable shared competence across persons, tools, and environments that does not hollow out the focal system's role in carrying the function. Distinguished from substitutive dependence by whether the focal system remains a genuine participant in the shared function.
Structural Dependence
SA condition in which continuing function relies on external carrying in ways that make the focal system less able to bear the load on its own terms. Structural dependence is often invisible because function appears stable; it becomes visible when the external support is disrupted.
See: Why Structural Dependence Hides Behind Functional Success · Substitutive Dependence
Substitutive Dependence
SSupport that preserves output while reducing participation in the load-bearing function over time. The defining pathology in Alignment Theory: the system's outputs are maintained, but the structural capacity required to produce those outputs without external carrying is eroded.
See: Participation, Co-Regulation, and Substitution · AI Civilization and Human Formation · Addiction and Recovery
Support Relation
SAny external or distributed structure that helps carry a load-bearing function over time. Support relations are not inherently problematic — the framework distinguishes between types of support by whether they preserve, deepen, or erode participatory capacity.
Transition Trigger
TThe condition or event that causes a system to shift from one structural state to another — typically from developmental scaffolding into substitutive dependence, or from substitutive dependence into reintegration.